From: McGuire, Kelly (mcg05004_at_byui.edu)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2019 - 13:12:56 CST
Thanks BKR, I had not hear of RAMD. This looks promising.
Kelly L. McGuire
PhD Candidate
Biophysics
Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology
Brigham Young University
LSB 3050
Provo, UT 84602
________________________________
From: Brian Radak <brian.radak_at_gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 12:06:09 PM
To: namd-l; McGuire, Kelly
Subject: Re: namd-l: Constant Velocity Pulls
Hi Kelly,
Unfortunately, I think this is a question much better answered by the literature than by anyone particular on the listserv.
One thing you might consider is the new RAMD<http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.13/features.html> feature in NAMD 2.13 (look at the bottom of the feature summaries).
HTH,
BKR
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:00 AM McGuire, Kelly <mcg05004_at_byui.edu<mailto:mcg05004_at_byui.edu>> wrote:
I keep being told that I should resist using constant velocity SMD when looking for ligand/protein separation leaving times, but with no explanation. Why can't I use constant velocity pulling to compare leaving times for different ligands in a protein?
Kelly L. McGuire
PhD Candidate
Biophysics
Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology
Brigham Young University
LSB 3050
Provo, UT 84602
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Dec 31 2020 - 23:17:10 CST